Nadiem Makarim Accused of Marking Up Chromebook Prices, Allegedly Causing State Losses

The Minister’s authority is limited to policy; Laptop prices are determined through market mechanisms and the government e-catalog under procurement regulations, while procurement implementation is delegated to structural officials.

The Minister’s authority is limited to policy; Laptop prices are determined through market mechanisms and the government e-catalog under procurement regulations, while procurement implementation is delegated to structural officials.

From the outset, Nadiem applied  standards that went beyond common practice by involving all relevant institutions in the procurement process, in order to ensure transparency and accountability at every stage.

In addition, the 2024 BPKP audit–covering procurement activities in 2020 and the 2021-2022 period– showed that there was no price mark-up in the selection and procurement process for Chrome OS at the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

Two BPKP Audits: No Price Mark-Up 

  • The results of the BPKP audits for 2020 and 2021–2022 show that there was no price mark-up in the Chrome OS procurement process at the Ministry.

  • Although not required, the entire Chrome OS procurement process at the Ministry involved JAMDATUN* (Attorney General’s Office), LKPP**, BPKP***, and KPPU****, at Nadiem’s request.

  • The aim was to ensure regulatory compliance, accuracy, accountability, and to prevent any potential conflict of interest.

* JAMDATUN: Deputy Attorney General for Civil and Administrative Affairs
** LKPP: National Public Procurement Agency (institutionally accountable to the President)
*** BPKP: Finance and Development Supervisory Agency
**** KPPU: Business Competition Supervisory Commission

To date, the legal counsel team has not received any BPKP audit report regarding the state losses cited in the indictment.

Allegation

It is alleged that Chromebook laptop prices during the procurement process were significantly higher than market prices

Fact

In fact, according to BPKP audits in 2020 and follow-up audits for the 2021–2022 period, there was no evidence of price mark-ups in the selection and procurement of Chrome OS at the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

Allegation

It is alleged that Chromebook laptop prices during the procurement process were significantly higher than market prices

Fact

In fact, according to BPKP audits in 2020 and follow-up audits for the 2021–2022 period, there was no evidence of price mark-ups in the selection and procurement of Chrome OS at the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

From the outset, Nadiem applied  standards that went beyond common practice by involving all relevant institutions in the procurement process, in order to ensure transparency and accountability at every stage.

In addition, the 2024 BPKP audit–covering procurement activities in 2020 and the 2021-2022 period– showed that there was no price mark-up in the selection and procurement process for Chrome OS at the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

Two BPKP Audits: No Price Mark-Up 

  • The results of the BPKP audits for 2020 and 2021–2022 show that there was no price mark-up in the Chrome OS procurement process at the Ministry.

  • Although not required, the entire Chrome OS procurement process at the Ministry involved JAMDATUN* (Attorney General’s Office), LKPP**, BPKP***, and KPPU****, at Nadiem’s request.

  • The aim was to ensure regulatory compliance, accuracy, accountability, and to prevent any potential conflict of interest.

* JAMDATUN: Deputy Attorney General for Civil and Administrative Affairs
** LKPP: National Public Procurement Agency (institutionally accountable to the President)
*** BPKP: Finance and Development Supervisory Agency
**** KPPU: Business Competition Supervisory Commission

To date, the legal counsel team has not received any BPKP audit report regarding the state losses cited in the indictment.

This website is developed as a public reference to accompany the Nadiem Makarim Chromebook case by presenting facts, legal context, and verifiable evidence in a transparent and accountable manner. It is intended to support an informed public discourse and to uphold the principles of due process and the presumption of innocence. The content and documentation are compiled and managed by the Legal counsel Team.

Correspondence & Clarification:

For inquiries, clarifications, or the provision of additional information related to the facts, data, and documents presented on this site, please contact:

© 2026 FaktaNadiem.org All rights reserved.

This website is developed as a public reference to accompany the Nadiem Makarim Chromebook case by presenting facts, legal context, and verifiable evidence in a transparent and accountable manner. It is intended to support an informed public discourse and to uphold the principles of due process and the presumption of innocence. The content and documentation are compiled and managed by the Legal counsel Team.

Correspondence & Clarification:

For inquiries, clarifications, or the provision of additional information related to the facts, data, and documents presented on this site, please contact:

© 2026 FaktaNadiem.org All rights reserved.

This website is developed as a public reference to accompany the Nadiem Makarim Chromebook case by presenting facts, legal context, and verifiable evidence in a transparent and accountable manner. It is intended to support an informed public discourse and to uphold the principles of due process and the presumption of innocence. The content and documentation are compiled and managed by the Legal counsel Team.

Correspondence & Clarification:

For inquiries, clarifications, or the provision of additional information related to the facts, data, and documents presented on this site, please contact:

© 2026 FaktaNadiem.org All rights reserved.